Your brand-new airgun just arrived, and you are eager to try it out. You also purchased a air rifle scope (make sure it's airgun rated if you plan to install on a springer) and the recommended mounts and rings that fit, and all you need to do now to enjoy your new acquisition is to install the scope on the gun. So go ahead….install the scope and get shooting!
What do you mean you’ve never put a scope on a gun before? Really? Oh….okay. Well, it isn’t hard, so let’s just walk through it together. Airguns come in many shapes and sizes, and different manufacturers use different mounting systems. As a general rule, you will most likely find 3/8' (11 mm) dovetail grooves machined into the top of the receiver on the majority of airguns. However, some manufacturers use a different system that installs a rail on top of the receiver. Be sure to check the width of the rail so you can order the proper-sized mounts. If you come from the firearm world, and are used to Weaver-style mounts, there are adaptors that convert from dovetail to Weaver, allowing you to use mounts you already possess. Now consider the air rifle you have purchased. Is it a heavy-recoiling springer? If so, you will want to take advantage of the scope stop that hopefully came with the gun. Often, you will find scope stop holes already provided by the manufacturer on top of the receiver between the dovetails. If the scope mounts you purchased have a scope stop pin, the pin goes in the hole to prevent the entire mount and scope from creeping back on you when shooting. If there are no holes provided, then you can install a scope stop near the rear of the dovetail that will provide that function for you. A one-piece mount is often a good investment if you have a heavy-recoiling airgun, in that it provides a longer gripping surface than a two-piece mount. They aren’t quite as flexible as a two-piece mount, but they are very stable, and lessen the need for a scope stop. If your airgun is a lower-recoiling type, either a low-powered springer or a PCP/CO2-powered gun, a scope stop is rarely called for as the recoil isn’t enough to cause your scope to creep.
Taking the top of the rings off the scope mount, place the mount or mounts on the gun and fasten them to the gun. Don’t bear down on the fastening screws yet, as you may need to make some adjustments.
Place your scope in the rings, making adjustments for a good fit, and place the top half of the rings on the mount.
Fasten the top of the rings just enough to hold the air rifle scope in place, yet allowing you to still be able to turn and slide the scope forward and back. Now position the scope so that the eye-relief is to your liking, perhaps 2” to 4”. (Eye-relief is the distance from your eye to the rear of the scope, the part that you are looking through). Once the correct distance is obtained, rotate the scope in the rings so that the scope is level in the rings. The vertical reticle in the scope needs to divide the gun in half when you look through it. Now that you have the correct eye-relief adjusted, and your scope is mounted evenly in the rings, fasten the rings down on the scope by alternately tightening the screws. On a four-screw ring mount, I normally do two on the front (diagonally positioned from each other), then two in the back. I then fasten down the others, alternating from front to back. It’s sort of like changing a flat-tire….you tighten the lug nuts alternately, not the ones next to each other. Be careful that you don’t bear down too hard on the ring screws….you can damage the tube of your scope, which certainly isn’t your intention. After the rings are tightened down, go back and tighten the entire mount to the gun. There is an issue that affects your scope-mounting procedures. It is called barrel droop, seen mostly in break-barrel designs. Since the open sights on an air rifle are on the barrel, shooting with open iron sights will not affect your point of aim. However, when you place a scope on the gun, the scope is mounted on the receiver, not the barrel. To compensate for the barrel droop found in some airguns, you must sometimes shim the scope in the rear mount to more closely align the scope with the barrel. There are different materials you can use, from tape to strips of aluminum cut from a drink can. However, to avoid having to shim the scope, an adjustable mount can be purchased that will allow you to make adjustments to the mount itself in order to compensate for barrel droop. The RWS C-Mount is a terrific mount. It is fully adjustable for windage and elevation and makes sighting in a scoped air rifle a breeze. You might think that you can just sight your scope in with the adjustments on the scope itself but sometimes the barrel droop is too severe for this and the scope will not have enough adjustments to get you on target. RWS air rifles are know for this and, therefore, the RWS C Mount is recommended for them. Another option is to buy pre-compensated mounts that have a built in droop allowance already machined into the mount itself. It isn’t an adjustable mount, but the mount was purposefully machined with a slightly higher rear scope ring to allow the scopes normal adjustment knobs to be able to adjust enough within their normal working range to get you on target. Once you’ve mounted your scope, grab a piece of paper or cardboard, some pellets, and let’s go sight in your scope-mounted air rifle. Place the target about 10 yards away. Since we are so close to our target, protective eye wear would be a good thing to have in the event of a ricochet. Take a few shots at the center of the paper, seeking to just get on the page. Using the scope's horizontal adjustment knob, get the point of impact horizontally centered on the target. Once you’ve accomplished this, work on the vertical adjustment to bring the point of impact to about 1” or so below the point of aim. Now move the target out to 30 yards away and shoot a group of 4 or 5 shots. Don’t worry about flyers that differ from the group at this point, concentrate on the group itself. At 30 yards, you should be close to dead on for most airguns. This will vary from gun to gun depending on the power of each gun. Don’t forget that if you shoot a different pellet than the one you used to sight in with, you will have a different point of impact due to the weight of the pellet and the fit of the pellet in the barrel. So sight in your gun with the pellet you intend to use. Mounting a scope isn’t hard, and the method described above will suit the vast majority of airgunners. There are more advanced methods for FT shooters and accuracy devotees that involve using a level, working up a chart to plot the impact point of each type of pellet, and adjustments to the scope for each shot that occurs at a different range. I’ve never used that method myself, finding the above method of scope mounting more than adequate for hunting and plinking.So now you’re ready to go shooting. Enjoy!
By Randy Mitchell Written Exclusively for Airgun Depot
Amazing Riflescope Myths
Above, courtesy of Japan Optics, is the First Focal Plane reticle favored in European scopes and found in Pride-Fowler 'Rapid Reticle' riflescopes. Below is a representative Second Focal Plane reticle design, sometimes deemed the 'American Style.'
Rifle Scope Adjustment Knobs
Bigger Objectives = Better Image
Above, the Swarovski Z6 1-6 x 24mm. Optically superb, this 30mm tactical scope goes for $1850 or so, retains a 4mm exit pupil throughout its zoom range, and you'll note that this optic has what many might think is a diminutive 24mm objective.
Not automatically. With more curvature to a large objective lens, the image is prone to be less clear. As we are bending light, it takes more effort (and dollars) to correct the situation. Well-known as spherical aberration, this is well-covered in Modern Optical Engineering, 3rd Ed., by Warren J. Smith. Further, larger objective lenses weigh more-- a disadvantage in handling recoil. Regardless of objective size, the light is still going to have to travel through a 1 inch or 30mm tube. Monster objectives aren't used in high-end binoculars. The Swarovski 8.5x42 EL Binocular runs $2400 U.S. or thereabouts, has 42mm objectives, and a 4.9mm exit pupil. Image quality remains far more important in a target glassing, locating and acquisition device than in an aiming device. Spherical lenses are used mainly because they are relatively inexpensive to make. Larger pieces of suitable glass for scopes are more costly than smaller ones. For the same dollars, similar price points: we can get better quality, smaller, lower mass objective lenses . . . and better overall hunting scopes as well.
30mm Tubes are Better
With larger lenses and a larger guide tube in a 30mm scope, you might actually have less adjustment than in a one inch scope. No matter how big the objective, the light still has to focus through the far smaller internal lenses, diminishing the value of larger objectives.
Not necessarily. The primary advantage is they are stronger, far stronger than their one inch counterparts. If the internal lenses are the same size, they can do nothing to flow more light. With larger erector assemblies centered in the tube, they may actually reduce internal adjustment as well. They are stronger, though, some five to ten times as strong. If a riflescope is designed to get the most out of the platform, meaning appropriately large internal lenses, both one inch and 30mm tubes will have very similar internal adjustment ranges.
Lightweight Scopes are Better
Above, courtesy of Hawke Sports Optics, the most popular brand of scope in the U.K. (and the most popular crossbow optic manufacturer in the world), you can see how the relatively ocular and objective lenses make up a significant portion of the weight of a scope: the bulk of scope weight is from the glass. Hawke scopes are able to withstand more recoil than most, exactly what you might expect from a company with its roots in high performance air rifle applications.
Not necessarily. A light weight scope is only lighter in weight, 'for sure.' The majority of the mass in a riflescope is the glass. More sophisticated lens elements add weight, larger internal lenses may manage light better-- but, weight goes up in concert as well. Stronger, thicker tubes add a bit of weight, as do options like illuminated reticles. More features, more weight, but not necessarily a bad thing.
A Brand of Scope is More Reliable
No, no 'brand' is the most reliable. Specific scope models within a brand may well have better track records than others, but internally documented return data is the only evidence of what is and what isn't particularly problematic, and the scope companies won't tell you that. The better companies making running production changes for problem models. Fixed power scopes are the simplest and “suggest” more reliability (two or three less lenses), as do scopes with steel tubes.
For the time it takes to put many thousands of high-powered rounds through a rifle, something hunters don't generally do, speculating whether a scope is 'reliable' or not is a waste of time. It is one-incident reporting, margin of error +/- 100%. Q. If you took twenty of the most expensive, well-built, sought-after automobiles in the world, under the worst imaginable conditions, which one would start? A. The one without the dead battery. You can apply this to scopes as well. Q. What scope lasts the longest in the field? A. The one that was mounted properly and not used as a carrying handle. Believe it or not, sometimes scopes are bent or bowed during mounting-- so that factors in along the way, however imprecisely.
Air Rifle Scope Run Out Of Adjustment Chart
Scopes Gather Light
Just as Schmidt & Bender has long published, it is not possible for a scope to gather light. A riflescope can only transmit light. The human cannot detect any difference in light transmission below a 3% variance. Light transmission percentages that are published are often just theoretical. A spectrophotometer can be used to measure light at the objective and what actually exits the scope. Most manufacturers don't bother. It will vary by specific scope model and the number of lenses within that specific scope. You might get the wrongful impression that it is a constant from catalog data, but it is anything but.
Etched Reticles are Weak
Etched reticles are considered the most reliable reticles by most high-end scopemakers, ten times as strong as some wire reticles. That includes $3100 Schmidt & Bender models, Zeiss, Kahles, and so forth. Rather than a mechanical piece of flattened wire, the etched reticle can only be destroyed if you destroy the glass itself. If we really believe that glass cannot be reliable in an aiming device, it might be time to consider going back to iron sights. Schmidt & Bender uses etched reticles in all of their variable power scopes, reportedly the first manufacturer to do so.
An etched reticle requires more attention to detail when it comes to the internal lubrication of a scope, scope purging, and the quality of the black anodizing inside a scope tube. In fact, the tinest speck of dust or anodizing can get caught in the laser engraved surface, proving to be both annoying and distracting. A new scope of lesser quality might appear to be defect-free. Once the erector assembly is cycled, a bit of anodizing or dust can be freed . . . and it invariably finds the reticle. You can take this from folks like Mike Kurtz of Hawke Optics, who evaluates 100 - 200 riflescopes every day.
There is a Best Low Light Scope
No such thing, as many scopes run out of usable reticle prior to losing the ability to target. Humans all have different, unique sets of eyes. We don't see identically, any more we smell or taste things identically. Low light has no precise definition, like 'room temperature.' No matter how hot or how cold a room gets, it is still room temperature. Reticle choice combined with usable exit pupil (based on our eyes) and at the magnifications we intend to use at our own versions 'of low light' are reasonable considerations. Reticle selection is one of the most important factors in scope usability after sunset.
Lead Sleds Are Good for Scopes
Not only are they rough on scopes, the point of impact with Lead Sleds is invariably high compared to shoulder-fired shooting due to the extra muzzle rise. It scales in concert with the intensity of the load. If you want to sight in a rifle for hunting use, your shoulder is the better option. That's the way we tend to use them in the field.
I mostly just wanted a graphics overhaul mod to update the graphics, but I don't like the idea of downloading from random sites, especially on my new Alienware.The best part about games with workshops on them is they are still modded for and fans will always support the game with modding capabilities. Mods can add a lot of replayability and new stuff.
No Fault Warranties Mean Better Scopes
Not at all. It just increases the per unit cost. A lifetime warranty, according to industry insiders, just increases the cost of a scope by about twenty percent. It doesn't improve the scope at all. What tends to improve a scope is tighter quality control and higher rejection rates. The company standards may be high, but most scopemakers rely on sourced parts and someone has to monitor the quality of those vendored parts: meaning reject them or change vendors if needed. Who rejects the most scope components and has the best Q.C. is of course a mystery: both cost money and you can't readily see it just looking in the box. The problem with lifetime warranties are the associated legacy costs. Something like the current 'Social Security plan.' Generous warranties might make you feel better, the general idea. But the best warranty is still the one that you never have to use.
Scopes Get Repaired
Above, a cross section of the Swarovski Z6: a scope that is certainly worth servicing, if ever the need arises.
Sometimes, but rarely. For mass-produced value-priced to mid-range scopes, often the labor cost of a skilled technician to work through a broken scope is several times the entire cost of new, freshly manufactured product. As a result, often it makes no sense for a manufacturer to overpay to repair a scope, and they don't.
Ballistic Reticle Scopes are Smart
They have their place, but as long as the reticle is constant in size, they are essentially fixed-power scopes, functioning only at one power setting, typically all the way up. Only first focal plane scopes work as hold-over scopes at all magnifications, as in a Pride-Fowler Industries FFP scope. If you know your trajectory and constrain yourself to hold-points and ranges no higher than a big game animal's back, the benefits are not of any practical field advantage for big game hunting.
Adjustment Tracking is Vitally Important
Not always, certainly not in a big game hunting scope. You set it and forget it. There is little reason to fiddle with knobs and clicks when hunting big game. Wait for the right moment, place your shot, then go pick him up. Sighting a scope in, naturally you want adjustments to adjust. The great precision and repeatability of those adjustments has no value unless you are a knob-twirler, something not wanted, much less actually needed, in most big game hunting.
Edge to Edge Clarity is Very Important
Not really, as your aiming point is in the center of the reticle, not at the periphery of the image. Binoculars and spotters are designed for frequent glassing and game location, not riflescopes. Yet, a 'good scope' is sometimes designated as good on the basis of how well they are at doing what they aren't designed to do: glassing mountains. As a friend of mine likes to say, if you use your binoculars for three hours, you might use your spotter for fifteen minutes, and your riflescope for sixty seconds.
The Best Thing About a Scope is Image Quality
Not at all. The very best thing a riflescope can do is hold its zero. If it can't do that, it is worthless. Brightness can be over-rated, as a brighter 'blob' lacking definition might offer no improvement in your ability to quickly target an object. Some of the most versatile and desirable scopes in the world are not the brightest, as they have more lens surfaces that necessarily reduce light transmission. Note also that some of the finest sets of binoculars made today, like the Swarovski EL, designed to be looked through constantly, have 91% light transmission.
Here is a very common catalog statement: 'For optimum image quality, it is important that the optical system of a riflescope deliver as much light as possible to the eye of the shooter. The lighter or brighter the image, the sharper the resolution and the clearer the shot.' It couldn't be more wrong. The human eye can only use so much light-- excessive light means squinting and discomfort. No one wears sunglasses because they want more light. a brighter image does not mean it is more clear, it just means it is brighter. A common definition of resolution quantifies how close lines can be to each other and still be visibly resolved. Resolution does not come in sharpness or brightness, it comes in lines. Turning up the brightness of an image does not focus it better, remove abberations or flaws, nor does it automatically increase resolution. Too much light can be a problem, the reason shooters develop cataracts in their shooting eyes first. UV radiation is invisible to the eye and well-documented as being problematic. Riflescopes actually transmit radiation, not just visible-spectrum light.
While certainly the image we think is 'better' is better, according to us, the notion of brightness and resolution is overplayed in an aiming device, at least for marketing purposes. Many things help make an image better, control of stray light, flaring, color fidelity, focus. An out of focus image may well be bright, but a blurred image is still a poor image, regardless. A riflescope that holds its zero is better than any scope that doesn't. Other factors, like eye relief, can be far more important than calculated light transmission percentages or theoretical resolution.
Scopes Are Better than Ever Today?
A few of the many choices in shooting lenses from Randolph Engineering, showing light transmission from 12% to 31%.
Quite true. The fully multi-coated riflescope did not appear until 1972 by Kahles. The first American manufacturer to offer fully-multi-coated scopes was Burris in 1980. The 'uncoated lens' can lose about 4% of light transmission (per surface). This works exponentially when additional lenses are involved. In a riflescope using six lenses the light transmission may now be 78% (.96*6). Six lense elements fully multi-coated (twelve surfaces) can theoretically hit over 98% light transmission, providing less light losses and better contrast. While the human eye may readily be able to discern the difference between 78% and 90% of visible light, inside the 3% human eye threshold humans cannot tell, although machines can.
There is often too much light as well, the reason our pupils are not constantly dilated. Optical experts agree that the best light transmission range for sunglasses is from only ten to thirty percent, meaning 'average' sunglasses may only let through about 1/5th of the light of a quality riflescope. If you wear eyeglasses, are they coated or multi-coated? If they aren't coated, our glasses might have only 92% light transmission, so why are worried about our scope? Note that Randolph Engineering's 'Moss Yellow Polarized' lens is not recommended for bright conditions, but is recommended for 'dusk and dawn' . . . with a light transmission of 31 percent.
Safety is a Good Reason to Scope your Rifle
Absolutely true. The riflescope is one of the most important safety features you can add to your rifle. It is the last and best chance we have to know what is to the left, right, and behind your target before you fire the bullet that cannot be called back. The DNR departments that prohibit scope use do so at the sad expense of hunter safety.
Glass, Eye Relief, & Parallax
May 30, 2019 Return of the Prince - Prince of Persia: The Forgotten Sands - Part 1: 2019-05-30: Chance Encounter - Days Gone - Part 18: 2019-05-29: Journey to the West - Sekiro: Shadows Die Twice - End. Ubisoft montreal. Ubisoft quebec. Ubisoft singapore. Ubisoft casablanca. Playstation 3. Nintendo wii. Intitle:index of prince of persia ubisoft download. Use this forum to discuss previous Prince of Persia titles on all platforms. Jul 02, 2013 Prince of Persia: The Forgotten Sands. Developer: Ubisoft Montreal; Publisher: Ubisoft; Genre: Action; Release Date: May 18, 2010 (US) About Prince of Persia: The Forgotten Sands. Visiting his brother's kingdom following his adventure in Azad, the Prince finds the royal palace under siege from a mighty army bent on its destruction. Jul 23, 2014 This video is unavailable. Watch Queue Queue. Watch Queue Queue.
You've likely heard a lot of comments about “good glass,” “better glass,” and “upgraded glass.” Naturally, these are largely meaningless statements. There certainly are well-accepted ways to grade glass, though. You can easily find all the technical information about optical glass you can stand from major glass manufacturers. They include Schott, Hoya, and Ohara. All three make high grades of optical glass that are interchangeable with each other.
What about eye-relief? Sure, no one wants scope-eye, and we all need adequate eye relief for the application. Stated eye relief is only calculated, it varies from person to person. When you focus the reticle on your scope, you move the end of the ocular portion closer to your eye, or farther away. The eye relief of a scope is contingent on how you move the ocular end to focus the reticle for your eyes. One scope called “short” eye relief by one person might well be perfectly acceptable to another. We all adjust our ocular ends a bit differently, changing eye relief as we do so.
Truly constant eye relief doesn't happen, unless you are using a fixed power scope. However, some scopes have more consistent eye relief throughout the zoom range. If the eye relief change is held within three quarters of one inch throughout the zoom range, I'd call that perfectly acceptable. However, we all get to decide how we use our scopes. If, for example, we have a 3-10 scope but only take shots on big game from 3X to 6X, then that is the only area of eye-relief that is relevant. By the same token, if we like the idea of a second focal plane hold-over reticle that only only works at 9, 10, or 12 power, then the remaining eye relief we have at those magnifications is important.
The optical illusion of parallax is always interesting, but at 6X or below is of no great importance. If our eye is in the center of the exit pupil of a riflescope, there is no parallax issue, regardless. Here is the way one manufacturer describes it: “Maximum parallax occurs when your eye is at the very edge of the exit pupil. Even in this unlikely event, our 4x hunting scope focused for 150 yards has a maximum error of only 8/10ths of an inch at 500 yards.” For most big game hunting at moderate magnification levels, parallax is just not an issue.
Links:
Copyright 2011 by Randy Wakeman. All Rights Reserved.
Comments are closed.
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |